i15_LandUse_Kern1990

ISO-19139 Metadata

Resource Identification Information:

Citation:

Title: i15_LandUse_Kern1990

Reference date - publication: 2022-11-01

Edition: 20001205

Presentation format: mapDigital

Party responsible for the resource - originator:

Organization's name: California Department of Water Resources

Themes or categories of the resource: farming, boundaries, imageryBaseMapsEarthCover, planningCadastre

Place keywords:

Keywords: Kern County, California

Theme keywords:

Keywords: boundaries

Thesaurus name:

Title: ISO 19115 Topic Category

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Theme keywords:

Keywords: Survey, Land use, Agriculture, Boundaries, Ground truth, 1990, Digital imagery, Vector, Raster, Image classification, California, Crop, Satellite imagery, Cadastral, Imagery, Kern County, Global Positioning System (GPS), Multispectral, Analysis, Survey year, Landsat, Irrigation, NDVI, Orthorectification, Urban, Residential, Orthoimagery, Native vegetation, Vineyard

Descriptive keywords:

Keywords: Downloadable Data
Thesaurus name: ArcGIS Content Type

Abstract: The 1990 Kern County land use survey data set was developed by DWR through its Division of Planning and Local Assistance (DPLA). The data was gathered using aerial photography and extensive field visits, the land use boundaries and attributes were digitized, and the resultant data went through standard quality control procedures before finalizing. The land uses that were gathered were detailed agricultural land uses, and lesser detailed urban and native vegetation land uses. The data was gathered and digitized by staff of DWR’s San Joaquin District. Quality control procedures were performed jointly by staff at DWR’s DPLA headquarters and San Joaquin District. Important Points about Using this Data Set: 1. The land use boundaries were hand drawn directly on USGS quad maps and then digitized. They were drawn to depict observable areas of the same land use. They were not drawn to represent legal parcel (ownership) boundaries, or meant to be used as parcel boundaries. 2. This survey was a "snapshot" in time. The indicated land use attributes of each delineated area (polygon) were based upon what the surveyor saw in the field at that time, and, to an extent possible, whatever additional information the aerial photography might provide. For example, the surveyor might have seen a cropped field in the photograph, and the field visit showed a field of corn, so the field was given a corn attribute. In another field, the photograph might have shown a crop that was golden in color (indicating grain prior to harvest), and the field visit showed newly planted corn. This field would be given an attribute showing a double crop, grain followed by corn. The DWR land use attribute structure allows for up to three crops per delineated area (polygon). In the cases where there were crops grown before the survey took place, the surveyor may or may not have been able to detect them from the field or the photographs. For crops planted after the survey date, the surveyor could not account for these crops. Thus, although the data is very accurate for that point in time, it may not be an accurate determination of what was grown in the fields for the whole year. If the area being surveyed does have double or multicropping systems, it is likely that there are more crops grown than could be surveyed with a "snapshot". 3. If the data is to be brought into a GIS for analysis of cropped (or planted) acreage, two things must be understood: a. The acreage of each field delineated is the gross area of the field. The amount of actual planted and irrigated acreage will always be less than the gross acreage, because of ditches, farm roads, other roads, farmsteads, etc. Thus, a delineated corn field may have a GIS calculated acreage of 40 acres but will have a smaller cropped (or net) acreage, maybe 38 acres. b. Double and multicropping must be taken into account. A delineated field of 40 acres might have been cropped first with grain, then with corn, and coded as such. To estimate actual cropped acres, the two crops are added together (38 acres of grain and 38 acres of corn) which results in a total of 76 acres of net crop (or planted) acres. 4. Water source and irrigation method information was not collected for this survey. 5. During the transfer of data from the INTERGRAPH system to the AUTOCAD system, some attributes were lost. For those polygons that were attributed with either “D” (double cropped) or “I” (intercropped), the second crop has asterisks in the two fields “IRR_TYP2PA” (irrigated or non-irrigated) and “IRR_TYP2PB” (type of irrigation system). There should have been either and “i” or “n” in the “IRR_TYP2PA” field, and a “U” or “*” in the “IRR_TYP2PB” field. 6. Not all land use codes will be represented in the survey.

Purpose: This data was developed to aid in DWR’s efforts to continually monitor land use for the main purpose of determining the amount of and changes in water use. The associated data are considered DWR enterprise GIS data, which meet all appropriate requirements of the DWR Spatial Data Standards, specifically the DWR Spatial Data Standard version 3.3, dated April 13, 2022. DWR makes no warranties or guarantees - either expressed or implied - as to the completeness, accuracy, or correctness of the data. DWR neither accepts nor assumes liability arising from or for any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading subject data. Comments, problems, improvements, updates, or suggestions should be forwarded to gis@water.ca.gov.

Dataset language: eng

Dataset character set: utf8

Status: completed

Maintenance:

Update frequency: notPlanned

Resource constraints:

Constraints:

Limitations of use: The attached information was developed by the State of California, Department of Water Resources, for uses beneficial to the State. The information is available upon request to interested members of the public. While the Department believes the information to be reliable and made efforts to assure its reliability at the time the information was compiled, the information is provided "as is". The Department is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, quality or legal sufficiency of the information. Any expressed or implied warranties, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for purpose ARE SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMED. Neither the Department nor the State of California shall be held liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, exemplary or consequential damages (including, but not limited to: procurement of substitute goods or services; loss of use, data or profits; or business interruption), however caused and on any theory of liability, whether in contract, strict liability or tort, arising in any way out of the use of this information. This disclaimer applies to use of the information alone and to its aggregate use with other information, data or programs. The State of California and the Department of Water Resources hereby specifically retain any intellectual property interest, including copyright that they may hold in the information provided, whether the information is in the form of data, files, text images, photography or maps. The Department requests that persons receiving and using this information not make it available to others for their re-use. Instead, interested third parties should be encouraged to contact the Department for copies, in order to ensure that the information is obtained from the source that developed it, that can provide the greatest degree of reliability. Please acknowledge the California Department of Water Resources as a source when DWR's data are used in the preparation of reports, publications, maps and other products.

Resource constraints:

Legal constraints:

Access constraints: otherRestrictions
Other constraints: None. Please see 'Distribution Info' for details.
Limitations of use: Unless otherwise stated, all data, metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data on any other system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty.

Spatial representation type: vector

Processing environment: Version 6.2 (Build 9200) ; Esri ArcGIS 10.9.1.28388

Extent:

Geographic element - Bounding rectangle:

Extent contains the resource: true
West longitude: -120.2508
East longitude: -118.3575
North latitude: 35.8792
South latitude: 34.8683

Extent:

Extent description: Unknown

1990-01-01 1990-12-31

Extent:

Geographic element - Bounding rectangle:

Extent contains the resource: true
West longitude: -120.250995
East longitude: -118.375927
North latitude: 35.874965
South latitude: 34.87498

Supplemental information: Land-Use Data Quality Control This dataset is the final copy of 1990 Kern County Land Use Survey. Digital surveys published on this site are designated as either ‘Final’, or ‘Provisional’, depending upon its status in a peer review process. Each survey has been zipped into a downloadable folder which contains the survey shapefile or feature class and other documentation that further explains how that specific survey was processed, and how the information is interpreted. 'Final' surveys are peer reviewed with extensive quality control methods to confirm that field polygon attributes reflect the most detailed and specific land-use classification available, using the standard DWR Land Use Legend specific to the survey year. Data sets are considered ‘final’ following the reconciliation of peer review comments and confirmation by the originating Regional Office. During final review, individual polygons are evaluated using a combination of aerial photointerpretation, satellite image multi-spectral data and time series analysis, comparison with other sources of land use data, and general knowledge of land use patterns at the local level. 'Provisional' data sets have been reviewed for conformance with DWR’s published data record format, and for general agreement with other sources of land use trends. Comments based on peer review findings may not be reconciled, and no significant edits or changes are made to the original survey data.

Credits: California Department of Water Resources, Division of Regional Assistance (DRA), South Central Region Office, Land and Water Use and Conservation Section, and Water Use Efficiency Branch (Sacramento Headquarters).

Point of contact - pointOfContact:

Individual's name: Regional Office Land Use Manager

Organization's name: California Department of Water Resources, South Central Regional Office

Contact's position: Senior Environmental Scientist (Supervisor)

Contact information:

Address:

Delivery point: 691 N. Laverne Ave. Suite 104
City: Fresno
Administrative area: CA
Postal code: 93727
Country: US
e-mail address: Landuse@water.ca.gov

Spatial Representation - Vector:

Level of topology for this dataset: geometryOnly

Geometric objects:

Object type: composite
Object count: 16769

Reference System Information:

Reference system identifier:

Value: 3857
Code space: EPSG
Version: 6.18.3(9.3.1.2)

Data Quality Information:

Scope of quality information:

Level of the data:dataset

Lineage:

Process step:

When the process occurred: 2000-12-05T00:00:00
Description: Projection Information: The original dataset was reprojected to GCS NAD83 to conform with the rest of the Atlas land use dataset.

Process step:

When the process occurred: 2000-12-05T00:00:00
Description: Land Use Attributes: All land use attributes were coded using the Department's Standard Land Use Legend dated January 1981 (81legend.pdf). The legend explains in detail how each delineated area is attributed in the field, and what the coding system is. The actual land use code that is printed onto the field maps is different in arrangement than the codes that result from the digitizing process. The file attributes.pdf is a detailed explanation of the coding system used for both coding the field sheets, and the codes that are in digitized form in the database files associated with the shapefiles.

Process step:

When the process occurred: 2000-12-05T00:00:00
Description: Data Development: 1. The aerial photography used for this survey was taken in June of 1990. The photographs (natural color 35mm slides taken from an altitude of about 5,500 feet above ground), were visually interpreted and land use boundaries were drawn on USGS paper 1:24,000 quadrangles. 2. The quad maps were taken to the field as field sheets, and virtually all the areas were visited to positively identify the land use. The site visits occurred in July through September 1990. Land use codes were printed within each area on the field sheets. 3. Using an Intergraph digitizing system, the land use boundaries and attributes were digitized from the field sheets on a digitizing tablet. 4. After quality control/assurance procedures were completed on each file, the data was finalized. 5. The digital data was later taken from the INTERGRAPH system and brought into AUTOCAD. Because the algorithm used in the INTERGRAPH system to project the data into a coordinate system was not accurate, the data had to be reprojected by "rubber sheeting". The four corners of each land use quad file were used to warp the complete quad file into a new projection. 6. The linework and attributes from each DWG quad file were brought into ARCINFO and both quad and surveywide coverages were created, and underwent quality checks. These coverages were converted to shapefiles using ARCVIEW

Process step:

When the process occurred: 2000-12-05T00:00:00
Description: Data Accuracy: The original land use boundaries were drawn onto USGS quads, then digitized on a digitizing tablet (using an INTERGRAPH system). After this data was brought into AUTOCAD, it was reprojected by “rubber sheeting”, using the four corners of each quad file. It is difficult to say how accurate the linework is. The original digital linework was a result of digitizing hand drawn lines on a USGS 7 1/2 minute quad, so the accuracy was equal to or less than the accuracy of the USGS quads (about 50 feet). After rubber sheeting, the linework’s accuracy is probably reduced a little more. The land use attribute accuracy is very high, because almost every delineated field was visited in the field. The accuracy is less than 100 percent because some errors must have occurred. There are two possible sources of attribute errors which are: 1) Human error in the identification of crop types 2) Data entry errors

Source data:

Level of the source data: California Department of Water Resources, South Central Regional Office

Source citation:

Title: 1990 Kern Land Use Survey

Alternate titles: KN90

Reference date - publication: 2022-11-01

Edition: 20001205

Presentation format: mapDigital

Party responsible for the resource - originator:

Organization's name: California Department of Water Resources

Extent:

Extent description: Dataset has been reviewed by Land Use staff at Sacramento headquarters

1990-01-01 1990-12-31

Data quality report - Quantitative attribute accuracy:

Measure description: Quality control procedures were performed jointly by staff at DWR’s DRA headquarters, and South Central Region Office.

Data quality report - Conceptual consistency:

Measure description: To ensure the integrity of geospatial data ArcGIS geoprocessing tools and topology rules were used to locate errors for quality control. Data are considered logically consistent.

Data quality report - Completeness omission:

Measure description: The dataset contains land use data for the entire extent of Kern County.

Data quality report - Absolute external positional accuracy:

Measure description: Locational Quality: Determined to be no better than 50 feet horizontal. This report is not being made by a licensed land surveyor, and is not analogous to a positional accuracy statement as stipulated in the California Public Resources Code. The land use boundaries were hand drawn onto USGS 1:24,000 quads, and digitized on a digitizing tablet using AUTOCAD. For those areas where the lines were drawn onto USGS quads and digitized, the accuracy is less than that of the quads.

Distribution Information:

Format:

Format name: Feature Class

Metadata Information:

Metadata language: eng

Metadata character set: utf8

Last update: 2024-01-02

Metadata contact - pointOfContact:

Individual's name: Land Use Supervisor

Organization's name: California Department of Water Resources

Contact's position: Senior Environmental Scientist

Contact information:

Address:

Delivery point: PO Box 942836
City: Sacramento
Administrative area: CA
Postal code: 94236-0001
Country: US
e-mail address: Landuse@water.ca.gov

Scope of the data described by the metadata: dataset

Scope name: dataset

Name of the metadata standard used: ISO 19139 Geographic Information - Metadata - Implementation Specification

Version of the metadata standard: 2007